数罪并罚制度适用偏差的质性研究
A qualitative study on the Application Deviation of the Concurrent PunishmentSystem for Multiple Crimes
作者:巴卓(深圳职业技术大学，广东深圳518000)
关键词: 数罪并罚;法官视角;质性研究;适用偏差;调试路径 Concurrent punishment for multiple crimes; Judge's perspective; Qualitativeresearch; Applicable deviation ;Debugging path
摘要:目前国内法学界已对数罪并罚制度进行了较为深入的理论研究,但实证研究尤其基于法官视角的质性研究仍显匮乏。本文运用质性研究方法，对20名刑事法官进行半结构式深度访谈，基于扎根理论数据分析方法对访谈数据完成三级编码分析，以生成研究主题。研究发现，法官在适用数罪并罚制度时，存在四个维度的适用偏差:"先总后分"逆向量刑、并罚规则备而不用、发现漏罪机制缺位、撤销减刑适用分歧等。基于此，本文提出以下调试路径建议:一是严格禁止逆向量刑操作;二是更新并罚实体规则;三是构建并案移送制度;四是优化减刑撤销分层机制。
Abstract: At present, the domestic legal circle has conducted relatively in-depth theoreticalresearch on the system of concurrent punishment for multiple crimes, but empirical research,especially qualitative research from the perspective of judges, is still scarce. This paper employsqualitative research methods to conduct semi-structured in-depth interviews with 20 criminaljudges. Based on grounded theory data analysis methods, a three-level coding analysis of theinterview data is completed to generate research topics. Research has found that when judgesapply the system of concurrent punishment for multiple crimes, there are four dimensions ofapplication deviations: reverse sentencing based on the principle of "general first, then specific",the concurrent punishment rules being prepared but not used, the absence of the mechanism fordiscovering missed crimes, and differences in the application of revocation and commutationof sentences, etc. Based on this, this paper proposes the following debugging path suggestions:First, strictly prohibit reverse sentencing operations; The second is to update the rules forconcurrent penalty entities; The third is to establish a system for consolidated case transfer. Thefourth is to optimize the stratified mechanism for commutation and revocation of sentences.
